The following
interview appeared in the Christmas 2001 issue of Blah Blah, the Thames
Valley listings magazine
'For Whom The Ball Rolls' ‚ interview with
ace soccer writer, Ian Plenderleith, by Paul Jennings
The
footie season is well under way now and if, like me, you're an ardent follower
of the beautiful game, then 'For Whom The Ball Rolls' is a must-read. So much
football writing consists of turgid autobiographies that don't have much light
to throw on their subject, or are accounts by 'hard man' hooligans revelling
in kicking the shit out of rival fans. But
this little gem from Ian Plenderleith bucks the trend completely. This is
a collection of short stories, mostly about football, which actually pushes
the boundaries of football writing. Written by someone whose obvious love
of the game comes shining through in every tale, Plenderleith delves deep
into the psyche of both footie fans and players. There is an underlying darkness
in the stories coupled with a great grasp of the absurd. Well-crafted and
intelligent, the has author used the short story form to maximum effect.
A former journalist
based at BBC Monitoring in Caversham, Ian now resides in the USA. From his
home in Washington DC, Ian talked to Blah Blah...
The first story
in the collection, 'Save of the Day', reads like autobiography - how much of
you is in the book? Is there any resemblance between the thirtysomething
crises-ridden males in some of the stories and the author?
'Save
of the Day' is broadly autobiographical, as most reviewers have
guessed, and is the only story based on an incident that
actually happened
to me. The story that most reflects me though is 'Fitchie Gets The Point' as
there's a part of me in all three of the male
characters. Sometimes I'm like
Fitchie, the gibbering football enthusiast who won't
shut up; sometimes I'm
like the narrator, slightly detached but keen enough to
go and watch games
and get excited; and on occasions I've been like the
supercilious Sadler,
shunning football in favour of 'better' intellectual
pursuits - such phases
never lasted long, though, and were mainly confined to
when I was a student
searching for (and failing to find) new directions.
Another story many
people relate to is the one where the football fan has
to sit next to his
bored corporate client at the England v Germany match.
I've done corporate
socialising in my time as a journalist, and it's not
something I ever want
to go back to.
The short story isn't the most popular medium with publishers and the
reading public - why did you choose it? Do you think any of the stories
could
be expanded? Will you stick with the medium, or are you experimenting with
other things?
I started out writing short stories simply because I
wasn't ready to start
writing novels, so it was a learning curve thing. It's
very difficult to
persuade either agents or publishers to take any notice
of you when you're a
new writer, especially if you're writing short stories.
But I thought that
if I could write stories on one theme then someone might
take a look, and as
publishers are very keen on football books at the
moment, and have been for
the past five years, I settled on football as a central
subject. So, it was
quite a calculated decision. Once I'd decided to do
that, the ideas started
coming, and I was fortunate that Ian Preece, my editor
at Orion, was
interested when I sent him the first few that I wrote,
which gave me the
motivation to keep going.
I'm not sure any of them would work if they were expanded.
But if a
publisher offered me fifty grand to write a novel-length
version of 'The Day
FIFA Came To Lincolnshire' then I'm sure it would
concentrate my mind.
In general, it's sad that so few people read short stories
now
(although they do in the US still), and an indication of
how lazy we have
become as readers. There are so many novels you read
where one idea or theme is stretched out too long and you think it could have
been written as a good short story instead. Now no one writes short stories
because they think no one reads them. No one reads them because there are so
few around, and
publishing houses are too conservative to gamble with
them.
I'm still writing them, at the moment I'm writing a book
of love short stories, 'Ages In Love', working through the concept
of love as seen through the eyes of people ranging from a seven year old boy
through to a man on his deathbed. I imagine that they will be unsellable.
I recently finished writing a novel called 'Nightmare
Girl'Ý that can best
be described as a domestic black comedy pulp fiction
thriller. Unfortunately
my agent's having trouble persuading publishing houses
that such a genre
exists. I've recently started a new novel, but even I'm
not sure what it's
supposed to be about yet.
How did you find
the change from writing journalism to fiction?
I'm still a freelance journalist, with my most regular
stuff being for When Saturday Comes and
a column on US football at onetouchfootball.com. So I still write both. Writing
fiction has given me the chance to make up stories, which is what all journalists
secretly want to do.
What would you say to people who have noted that there's little point
writing fiction about football, because the sport itself throws up so
many
stories?
To me that's like saying there's no point in writing
fiction at all, because
real life throws up so many stories. Sure, there's no
point in writing a
story about Mudchester United winning the FA Cup, but
most of the stories in
'For
Whom The Ball Rolls' only use football as a basis, or as a setting to
work around.
It's strange, though, that football and fiction rarely
work together,
either on the page or on film. In baseball, I'm told,
there are countless
examples of great works in both genres.
What do you think of the whole Hornby/Parsons Lads Lit genre? Do you
consider yourself
a part of it?
I think Hornby's latest, 'How To Be Good', is excellent,
a real return to
form after 'About A Boy'. I've not read anything by Tony
Parsons, and don't
know who else might be included in the category 'Lads
Lit'. I doubt that
'Lads Lit' is really a genre, rather a convenient label
for journalists.
And finally, how
does the experience of following football in the USA compare to back home?
I'm enjoying watching 'soccer' in the US, and I'm
looking forward to following the US team at the World Cup. The new professional
league here (Major League Soccer) has just completed its sixth season, although
they have a long way to go before it becomes a viable business (very important
in the US). There's a strong base of mainly Latino support, and that should
steadily grow over the coming years as soccer is becoming a huge grass-roots
sport at schools level. It's good that the game is so low key here and not
subject to the inflated hype of the major Euro-leagues and the Champions
League, or indeed the most popular sports here like gridiron, basketball, and
baseball. It's still very much just about the game, not the showbiz-style
personalities involved.
I still try to listen to Lincoln City's games on the
Radio Lincolnshire
internet feed on Saturday mornings. I've even managed to
see them three
times this year on visits back to the UK. There's
something about supporting
a team like Lincoln from an early age (my Dad took me to
Sincil Bank for the
first time when I was six) that helps prepare you for
life - you rarely
build your hopes up high enough to have them dashed into
disappointment.